Sunday, December 29, 2019

In Abraham Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address, President...

In Abraham Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address, President Lincoln addresses a divided nation. Both the Union and the Confederacy are bitter to each other towards the end of the war. However, Lincoln calls both the north and the south to set aside their issues that divided them in order to heal their broken nation. Lincoln uses a slew of rhetorical methods in his speech such as tone, diction, and syntax to further assist him in achieving his purpose of uniting the nation. Lincoln’s optimistic tone encourages all Americans to put behind them the Civil War and progress forward as a united nation once more. President Lincoln calls to action all the peoples of America with sentences such as, â€Å"let us strive on to finish the work we are in† and†¦show more content†¦A pathway of reconciliation and healing is what President Lincoln wishes for the country. Lincoln also personifies the nation as having â€Å"wounds† which the American people must now bin d up in order to heal and save the nation from death. The phrase, â€Å"bind up† invokes the emotion of healing not only the personal wounds suffered by the American people because of the war, but also the wounds of the nation as a whole. After the nations wounds have been bound, then â€Å"lasting peace† will follow, as with the unity of the nation. President Lincoln also reminds the people of their similarities and focuses on their same religious belief and God by stating, â€Å"Both read the same Bible and pray to the same God†. In doing this Lincoln emphasizes the similarities of both the north and south in order to reunite them after the Civil War crisis. Lincoln’s speech also contains a balanced syntax to highlight the idea of a united and balanced nation by using a combination of long and shot sentences in his speech. An example of a long sentence would be one like, â€Å"While the Inaugural Address was being delivered from this place, devoted al together to saving the Union without war, insurgent agents were in the city seeking to destroy it without war, seeking to dissolve the Union and divide effects by negotiation†, and an example of a short sentence would be one like the following: â€Å"All dreaded it, all sought to avert it.† TheShow MoreRelatedThe Assassination Of Abe Lincoln2130 Words   |  9 PagesAn Analysis Over the Assassination of Abe Lincoln â€Å"Four score and seven years ago...† Abraham Lincoln was our 16th president and had his life taken after the North’s victory over the South; he lives on through these famous words of the Gettysburg Address. Abraham Lincoln was an important leader in the Civil War who helped free the slaves; his legacy lives on today. Although he was assassinated his words and actions are imprinted in our memory still today. This assassination was a major event inRead MoreYoshimoto Banana And Abe K ≈à ¥ B ≈à ¥ Essay1211 Words   |  5 Pages Yoshimoto Banana and Abe KÃ… bÃ…  are two contemporary Japanese writer stories of modern and post-modern Japan based on their experience and their sociological point of view. Yoshimoto Banana is a Japanese author who is successful and have popularity worldwide in her stories and novels with unpredictable action and characters. She is a well known Japanese author, who grow up in the 90’s with a background of pop-culture. Most of her books have a nice, simple and smooth story line. In her six’s storiesRead MoreAbe Lincoln Research Paper1734 Words   |  7 Pagesslavery. As one of the most well-known Americans the majority of Americans are aware that Abe Lincoln was born on February 12th, 1809. He was born in Hodgenville, Kentucky. Also, some facts people may not know are his parents, Thomas Lincoln, his father, was a respected figure in their community and was a strong and determined pioneer; and Nancy Hanks Lincoln, his mother, loving and caring, she taught Abe well. Lincoln was not an only child, he had a sister named Sarah and a brother named ThomasRead MoreAbraham Lincoln : Honest Abe1422 Words   |  6 Pagescitizen. Unfortunately, shortly after the battle, John Wilkes Booth assassinated him. The beliefs and morals he had formed throughout his lifetime resulting in his actions that gave him the nickname Honest Abe. Abraham Lincoln’s actions he has taken has proven him to be deserving of the nickname Honest Abe. Which is good for us because the world would be a very different place if he did not take the iconic actions he did during his presidency. The period we will be discussing is from the year 1858 to 1865Read MoreThe Rise of Abe Saperstein and the Harlem Globetrotters1393 Words   |  6 PagesAbe Saperstein: An Unconventional Champion of Civil Rights In 1924 a young Jewish man named Abe Saperstein was chosen to coach an African American semi pro basketball team called the Giles Post American Legion Quintet. Little did he know that with this position he would eventually revolutionize the game of basketball and help to initiate integration throughout the country, while establishing himself as an unknown and unconventional hero. Saperstein was a masterful promoter and businessman whoRead MoreAbe Lincoln and Slavery Essay example659 Words   |  3 PagesAbraham was born a poor farmhand boy in Kentucky, but he moved from small cabins in Kentucky, Indiana, and finally settled in Illinois. He was a farmhand for his father in these states and didnt have much exposure to slavery, although, these states did have black/slave laws. Lincoln got his first dose of slavery at the age of eighteen when he was hired to take a flatboat down to New Orleans. I quote from Lincoln: A Photobiography Lincoln would never forget the site of black men, w omen, and childrenRead More Abe Lincoln and Slavery Essay631 Words   |  3 Pages Abraham was born a poor farmhand boy in Kentucky, but he moved from small cabins in Kentucky, Indiana, and finally settled in Illinois. He was a farmhand for his father in these states and didn’t have much exposure to slavery, although, these states did have black/slave laws. Lincoln got his first dose of slavery at the age of eighteen when he was hired to take a flatboat down to New Orleans. I quote from Lincoln: A Photobiography â€Å"Lincoln would never forget the site of black men, women, and childrenRead MoreOrganic Extraction Distillation Process With Abe Extraction1521 Words   |  7 Pagessuch as low butanol yield and by-product formation (acetone and ethanol). The low productivities and butanol yields of ABE batch fermentation can be increased by continuous fermentation with cell recycle and integrated product removal. In order to facilitate an effective and energy-efficient produc t removal, we suggest to apply a hybrid extraction-distillation process with ABE extraction in an external column. INTRODUCTION Butanol (ethyl alcohol) is a four-carbon alcohol which hasRead MoreThe Humble President After Honest Abe2098 Words   |  9 PagesThe Humble President after Honest Abe Not all presidencies can have historic events of Washington or Jefferson. Some presidencies are consumed with political infighting or fractionation. President Ulysses Grant was born April 27, 1822 in Point Pleasant, Ohio. He graduated from US Military Academy at West Point in New York. He served from 1846 through 1854 when he quit the Army. He quit to spend time with his wife and four children. In 1860 Grant began to organize soldiers for the Union. In 1861Read More Similarities Between Dick Diver and Abe North in Tender is the Night1951 Words   |  8 PagesSimilarities Between Dick Diver and Abe North in Tender is the Night      Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Dick Diver and Abe North are characters in F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novel, Tender is the Night. As presented in the beginning of the novel, Dick Diver and Abe North did not seem to have much in common.   As the character of Dick Diver developed, the reader found the characters to be parallel to each other. There were numerous unexpected similarities as the novel progressed. The presentation of Abe Norths character â€Å"served as

Saturday, December 21, 2019

President Obama Hated On Friday Essay - 1119 Words

President Obama hated on Friday what he called a Republican (series of actions to reach a goal) to deny voting rights to millions of Americans as he stepped up efforts to motivate and excite his political base heading into a competitive midterm campaign season. Appearing at the once-a-year convention of the Rev. Al Sharpton s National Action Network in Manhattan, Mr. Obama (charged with a crime) Republicans of trying to rig the elections by making it harder for older people, women, minorities and the make extremely poored to cast ballots in swing states that could decide/figure out control of the Senate. The right to vote is threatened today in a way that it has not been since the Voting Rights Act became law nearly fifty years ago, Mr. Obama said in a hotel large room (for dancing) filled with cheering supporters, most of them African-American. Across the country, Republicans have led efforts to pass laws making it harder, not easier, for people to vote. Speaking a day after a (meeting to discuss things/meeting together) in Texas remembering (with honor) the 50th (yearly recognition or celebration) of the Civil Rights Act, Mr. Obama linked the issue to the movement that helped pave the way for him to become the nation s first black president. America did not stand up and did not march and did not sacrifice to gain the right to vote for themselves and for others only to see it denied to their kids and their (children of children), he said. Republicans inShow MoreRelatedThe Holocaust : A Mass Murder Of Millions Of Jews993 Words   |  4 Pagesand the Nazi party (supporters of Hitler) hated many people for many reasons. They hated jews because jews had most of the money,, most of the jobs, and had already established and owned most of the land in Germany. They hated handicapped people because they were believed to be â€Å"useless†, they hated Gypsies because Gypsies were believed to be thieves, they only hated homosexuals if a homosexual had any sort of a relationship with a German, and they hated Jehovah Witnesses becauses Jehovah’s wereRead MoreConservative Views Of The Republican Party Of 2016824 Words   |  4 Pagesargument (bereft of any facts) that said â€Å"If Bernie wins we’ll have a socialist president, and that is really scary!† It is this subject that I’d like to address: the unreasonable, rampant fear of socialism in America today. The Republican party of 2016 is hard to define, but one characteristic that stands out is their abject hatred (or fear of) socialism. They lashed out at the Affordable Care Act and president Obama as being socialist and have made the claim that it is greatest current threat toRead MoreThe Attack Of Al Qaeda Osama Bin Laden2640 Words   |  11 Pagesdecision came from none other than the most powerful man in the world the president of the United States of America Barak Obama. President Obama entered office in January 2009 with a full plate of hard choice to make in order to get the United States stronger, better, and most importantly safer. Knowing that Osama Bin Laden was still a free man in the world made the fear of many especially in American great. President Obama knew it was his duty while in office to hunt down and capture or kill BinRead MoreA Lesson Before Dying, by Ernest J. Gaines and None of this is Fair, by Richard Rodriguez1469 Words   |  6 Pagesfirst go and talk to Henri Pichot and ask him to ask his brother-in-law, the sheriff to let him teach Jefferson how to be a man. As he said â€Å"I had told her many, many times how much I hated this place and all I wanted to do was get away.† (Pages 14-15). This means that he was forced to stay in that place that he hated so much and they are making him do something that he did not want to. Also, after his talk to Henri Pichot he was forced again to go to the jail and teach Jefferson how to be a man. HeRead MoreIsis : Our Homeland Terrorist1950 Words   |  8 Pagesanother prophet or for Mohammed because the prophecy would have been filled. To one, that makes no sense, but to the believers of Islam it’s everything. They literally hate Christians and believe they should all be casted into Hell just like Hitler hated the Jewish. Besides Islam’s not liking Christians, they haven’t been a massive threat like they are today until a few years ago when a terrorist group called ‘ISIS† formed. ISIS stands for Islamic State of Iraq and Syria  and is sometimes referencedRead MoreAmerican History Eoc Study Guide5327 Words   |  22 Pagesautomatic coupler making train operation safer. 21) Pullman Train Cars Pullman Strike: George Pullman owned the Pullman Car Company and designed and built train cars. He cut his employees’ wages once and they went on strike with Debs leading them. President Cleveland used an injunction to stop the strike. 22) Hershey Family: He made new and innovation productions like milk chocolate which has wax in it. They create chocolate candies. 23) DuPont Chemicals: DuPont was a chemical company that createdRead MoreAccounting Information System Chapter 1137115 Words   |  549 Pagesappropriate behavior, which is reinforced by the corporate culture. Employees should be taught fraud awareness, security measures, ethical considerations, and punishment for unethical behavior. 5-1 Ch. 5: Computer Fraud 5.2 You are the president of a multinational company where an executive confessed to kiting $100,000. What is kiting and what can your company do to prevent it? How would you respond to the confession? What issues must you consider before pressing charges? In a kiting

Friday, December 13, 2019

American Foreign Policy and the War on Terror Free Essays

In the 21st century, the world is one in chaos- nations go to war for the slimmest of reasons, economies can topple overnight, and the ever-present threat of global terrorism holds the very real potential to kill thousands of innocent people in mere moments. Meanwhile, the United States holds the precarious position of being the largest and best established superpower in the world, generating an equal share of admirers and deadly enemies among the nations of the world. This being understood, the question begs as to what present day American hurdles such as the War on Terror have done to change American foreign policy? This research will attempt to answer this question through a comprehensive comparison of today’s foreign policy to that of the past, to the post and pre-9/11 world, and in conclusion, what all of this means for the future. We will write a custom essay sample on American Foreign Policy and the War on Terror or any similar topic only for you Order Now American Foreign Policy Throughout History An excellent way to see how American Foreign Policy has seemingly evolved is to compare it in the modern day to how it functioned in earlier times of modern American history. For example, as the US recovered from the horrors and deprivations of World War II, a very real and stark situation emerged on the foreign policy front. Despite the eradication of Nazism and the defeat of the threat that the Empire of Japan had represented to the US on a global scale, the threat of Communism in the form of the Soviet Union essentially kicked the Cold War into high gear, from the late 1940s to the mid 1990s. With two superpowers- the US and USSR-both possessing the awesome power to literally destroy the planet through the use of nuclear weapons, there was a vested interest in both nations, while maintaining a defensive position against each other, avoiding armed conflict at all costs (Jenkins, 2006). Therefore, decades of stalemates existed until the Communist regime of the USSR collapsed under its own weight and unwieldy power. In contrast, terrorism is more of an invisible enemy, albeit just as deadly as any opposing nation. Because of the difficulty in identifying exactly who terrorists are, from where they have come, and how they can be guarded against, it seems that the only way for a meaningful American foreign policy on this front to exist would be for the usual avenues of diplomacy, adherence to established rules and convention to be set aside- the governmental equivalent of taking off the gloves (Harding, 2004). Given such a scenario, it is possible to better understand the transformation of American Foreign Policy in a modern era of terror. Post and Pre- 9/11 American Foreign Policy On a clear, crisp day in September, 2001, the US was changed forever with the brutal terrorist attacks on New York, Pennsylvania and Washington, DC, the nation’s capital. This change not only effected the ways that Americans viewed each other and the safety level in their very own country, but the change also effected the way that the US created and carried out foreign policy. Earlier, the point was made that a fight against terrorists is vastly different than the battle against an organized, uniformed enemy and this calls for measures far different than ever carried out before. Perhaps it was easier for foreign policy to take shape in the days when the enemy was clearly identified and the US faced very little challenge to its power, anywhere in the world. However, once enemies began to come out of the shadows, and what were previously small, insignificant nations such as China, North Korea and India rose to levels of military, financial and diplomatic significance, the US was forced to reexamine foreign policy and adjust accordingly (Washington Times, 2007). With so many formidable nations on the international radar screen of sorts, every move that America made had to be studied before played out, much like a chess match, where each move could have a devastating response from an opponent. With such nations rising to prominence, their cultural, racial and religious differences also became more pronounced than ever before because in the past, these diverse nations were all somewhat insulated from one another due to the inability to lay claim to any kind of international clout. With the attainment of such clout, however, opposing nations began to clash on fundamental differences, and the US stood in the middle of it. In generations gone by, the US would have been able to merely step in and dictate how the disputes would be resolved, but that was essentially no more, and the US would essentially have to worry about retribution from both organized nations and the terrorists that hid in the shadows, ready to strike (Jenkins, 2006). This new era of American Foreign Policy would likewise bring forth another issue- aside from merely maintaining clout on the world diplomatic stage, how could a nation like the US promote democracy as it had in the past? American Imperialism, Pre and Post-Terror A key to the ongoing power of the American nation throughout its history has always been the ability to parlay military power into a means of spreading democracy across the globe, operating under the premise that if an opponent could not be defeated, they could be swayed more to the American way of thinking and thereby draw them closer to the alliance of the United States. After 9/11, however, all of this changed as well, as the US became diverted by the fight to protect its own native soil. Here, a great deal of controversy began to brew, and it continues today. The chaos that terrorism created in the US gave President George W. Bush and his administration the unique ability, under the premise of fighting terrorism and protecting the nation, to craft foreign policy with a dangerously sharp edge on it- policy, which essentially gave Bush permission to destroy any international haystack in search of a few small needles, as the search for terrorists often seems. Also, using the reasoning that the US needed to continue to have a free flow of oil from the volatile Middle East, policy which put the US on the offensive rather than the defense of the past likewise made it possible for US troops to be deployed to any nation that supposedly harbored terrorists or posed some type of threat to American interests (Fouskas, et al, 2005). This has, in recent years, generated resentment not only from other nations, but from the American people as well, evidenced by President Bush having the lowest public approval numbers of any president in history. Conclusion To sum up this research, what can be said about American Foreign Policy in relation to the War on Terror? In summary, what can be said is this- policy has seemed to derail as of late, focusing more on the interests of wealthy oil companies than the average American citizen and their need to be protected from terror. Therefore, what needs to be closely watched as the 21st century unfolds for America is that policy comes back to better mirror liberty and justice-for all. Works Cited Foreign Policy Adrift?. (2007, March 19). The Washington Times, p. A16. Fouskas, V. K. , Gokay, B. (2005). The New American Imperialism: Bush’s War on Terror and Blood for Oil. Westport, CT: Praeger Security International. Harding, B. (2004). An Orwellian Moment: The Myth of American Multilateralism Bruce Harding Reflects on the State of US Foreign Policy, in Terms of Its Self-Interest and Imperial Anchoring, as This Relates to the Current Administration’s New Security Strategy and the War on Terror. New Zealand International Review, 29(3), 23+. Jenkins, G. (2006, June). From Kennedy’s Cold War to the War on Terror: Gareth Jenkins Looks for Continuities in American Foreign Policy from the 1960s to the 2000s. History Today, 56, 39+. How to cite American Foreign Policy and the War on Terror, Essays